Livan On a Prayer?
Livan Hernandez is often dismissed, especially by fans engrossed with fantasy baseball. Ask them to summarize Livan's past and you might hear something like this:
ERA+ phenom bursts on the scene as 1997 WS MVP, Marlin and Giant ace, followed by predictable age-induced decline all the way down to it's current, awful, minimal VORP state.
Well, Livan's performance has taken a tumble, two actually. Fact is, he fell sharply immediately following his abbreviated rookie year, exceeding the adjusted league average ERA+ figure only once in his first five full seasons. Dusty Baker crowned him staff ace despite the fact Russ Ortiz was the superior pitcher.
Whether due to health, maturity, or Frank Robinson's tutelage in Montreal, El Duque's kid brother finally turned his career around in 2003, establishing a 155 ERA+ over 233 innings. This, not 1997, was the true high water mark from which his ERA+ has descended; to 115, 100, all the way to 94 last year.
Despite the drop, Livan's last 4 years still rather easily outshine his pre-Montreal days. How does one project this down and up (and down again) history onto 2007, especially after he recorded a better Aug/Sept ERA than any Dback starter -including Brandon Webb?
Zips projects his 2007 season thusly:
ERA W L G GS INN H ER HR BB K
Livan 5.14 9 16 34 34 231.0 258 132 31 83 142
The 9 and 16 jumps out for a guy who's been 54-48 over the last four years with some mediocre clubs. Given his actual, split-season 4.83 ERA, the 5.14 projection for a full year at Chase appears reasonable, until one breaks down the 4.83, by Livan's 2006 NL East and West opponents:
East ERA West ERA ERA diff.
FLA 11.05 COL 6.75 (4.30)
NYM 7.50 LAD 4.05 (3.45)
ATL 6.00 SD 3.79 (2.21)
PHI 4.64 SF 2.14 (2.50)
9 starts -- 64 IP 11 starts -- 73.3 IP
Wow! In 20 starts, Hernandez established an ERA more than three runs lower against the NL West than the East. That gap wont be sustained, but there's ample reason to believe that Livan will benefit from the division change. By our calculations, NYM, Atlanta and Phi were 3 of the NL's top four offensive clubs (adjusted); even lowly FLA rated sixth. The West,while better offensively than often given credit for, is more middle of the pack in scoring runs. We dont expect Livan to morph into a western ace, but
this "scenery change" will more than offset park factor for him and take the edge off an ERA that we project in the mid to high fours. Given his hitting, fielding and unquantifiable moxie, we suspect he'll find a way to win close to half his decisions.
One thing is for certain. Livan Hernandez is more effective in the real world than he is in a fantasy league. While the saber toothed stats trekkies drone on about his questionable components and pathetic peripherals, it wouldnt surprise Diamondhacks if Hernandez eventually usurps the #2 role from his more highly esteemed comrades on the Arizona staff.
Wouldnt surprise us at all, actually.

Hernandez *****
Report any abuse or spam
Ira,
two requests. One, please dont say **** on my blog.
And two, look into straightening a few of those teeth ;-)
Diamondhacks
Report any abuse or spam
The main problem I have with these stat maniacs is that they miss the point that the object of the game is to win. One thing about Hernandez is that he's willing to go out to the mound and throw 150 pitches if necessary to win the game regardless of the score. Some teams don't ask their pitchers to put up Johan Santana numbers; they ask them to keep their team in the game until the offense can get to the opposing pitcher. Every team can use a guy like Hernandez because (like Bronson Arroyo) his stuff isn't that great, but he's a true team player who'll do whatever he's asked to do; and that includes throwing 250 innings when most are only expected to throw 180-200 or so and are considered to have had a "good" season. Hernandez isn't a top of the rotation guy anymore, but as a three or four, you could do much worse. And unless you're starting a playoff series, the "number" a starter inhabits in the rotation is pretty meaningless for the majority of the workmanlike starters in the league. How many teams have had the early decade trio of Zito, Hudson and Mulder as the A's did? Not many; there are way more lunch pail starters than there are superstars. Two, three, four, what's the difference in a four game series in Pittsburgh in the middle of June?
Report any abuse or spam
"The main problem I have with these stat maniacs is that they miss the point that the object of the game is to win."
Agreed. I understand that his adjusted ERA has declined, but how you get a 9-16 W/L from a 32 year old who's never been more than 4 gms below .500 in his career, and is three years removed from such a season, stumps me. I just dont see that panning out, short of receiving uncharacteristically awful run support.
Report any abuse or spam